Trump-era "no‑bond" approach left detainees in Tacoma held for years, reporting finds
Key Takeaways
- It has been reported that a de facto "no‑bond" policy under the Trump administration led to long stays in immigration custody at a Tacoma detention center.
- The practice limited routine bond hearings for many noncitizens, keeping people detained while their immigration cases moved slowly.
- The policy affected asylum seekers and other detainees and raised legal and humanitarian concerns about prolonged detention without timely access to release.
- For people in removal proceedings, bond hearings before an immigration judge remain the primary route to release, but access and outcomes vary widely.
What reporters found
ABC News reports that a long‑standing pattern in Tacoma, Washington, saw immigration detainees routinely denied timely bond releases, effectively leaving many people in custody for months or years. The reporting describes local implementation of national priorities from the Trump administration that deprioritized bond hearings or argued for detention in more cases. It has been reported that some detainees who were eligible for bond nonetheless stayed locked up while their cases dragged through the immigration court system.
Legal context and who is affected
Bond in immigration court is different from criminal bail: an immigration judge can set a monetary bond to allow a noncitizen to remain free while contesting removal, unless the law requires mandatory detention for certain criminal convictions or national‑security grounds. ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) has discretion to pursue or oppose release, and policies set at the Department of Homeland Security can influence local practice. The Tacoma reports show that policy shifts can have an outsized local effect — especially on asylum seekers, long‑time residents with pending claims, and others who are not serving criminal sentences but still face civil immigration detention.
Human impact and what it means now
For people caught up in the system, the stakes are high: prolonged detention separates families, disrupts work and legal preparation, and makes it harder to gather evidence for asylum or other relief. Immigration attorneys say timely bond hearings and custody reviews are essential for a fair process. For someone going through the system now, the takeaway is to seek legal counsel quickly, request bond hearings, and pursue custody reviews — because outcomes depend on local practice and the willingness of judges and ICE to consider release. It has been reported that scrutiny of these practices has increased; legal challenges and policy shifts could change how custody decisions are made going forward.
Source: [Original Article](https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiogFBVV95cUxOQXc5M0VVdEJMdHN1TmdMTUFYd2NINWl3aEJyc0hNNURWQzVGbHlTZmNUYzNtR2IwcllCN1VMMENHTF9LVDVNSmw0NFdSaHF6VWsxOU1KMDZucUU5N1hqMi13ZGVBQnhad0hmdElXdllnTnR0b2kyeHJvRGN3c2JEbU9ZNkR4dS1uY3JORmc0TllTZHFwMTRzbzVESWk1MHJsalHSAacBQVVfeXFMUEtSelFSQzZxOEhWWGZCaGZRQkptX3lDaVBqdmxjTktlMXlwQlBKNThWYjN4dS1Uc2xhMkNKRUtsaXktOVhVYlNTZWY1TVhEMjdNMUtobUNpb0R2djZTRTI2eENQQmlpbjAyZ3VSaGhIRC05VF9VQVFPN0JlOUVUNlFMMlhfMVo2MmNERjBTRUNidDZYdDRvNnM2YmozcHhXN21XMEp3OU0?oc=5