Trump Administration Said to Push Some Green Card Applicants to Apply From Abroad

Key Takeaways

What is being reported

It has been reported that the Trump administration moved to require certain immigrants who are physically present in the United States to complete their green-card process at U.S. consulates overseas rather than by filing for adjustment of status (Form I‑485) with USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services). Adjustment of status allows an eligible noncitizen already in the U.S. to become a lawful permanent resident without leaving. Consular processing means applying for an immigrant visa through a U.S. embassy or consulate in the applicant’s home country or country of residence and attending an in-person interview there.

Who is affected and why it matters

The change reportedly affects family‑based and some employment‑based applicants who otherwise might have been eligible to adjust status in the United States. For affected people, the practical consequences are significant: leaving the U.S. to attend a consular interview can trigger the 3‑ and 10‑year unlawful presence bars if the person accrued unlawful presence before departure. Those bars often require an affirmative waiver (Form I‑601 or a provisional I‑601A) for readmission. In addition, many U.S. consulates have faced long backlogs and pandemic‑related closures, meaning interviews and visas can be delayed for months or longer — increasing separation and uncertainty for families.

Applicants who face consular processing should immediately speak with an immigration lawyer. Possible remedies include filing provisional waivers where eligible, seeking humanitarian parole or other discretionary relief, or filing motions with USCIS to preserve adjustment eligibility in narrow circumstances. Advocates may also pursue administrative or legal challenges to policy changes that alter long‑standing practices, though such litigation can take time. For someone mid‑process, the urgent questions are whether they qualify for an adjustment in‑country, whether they have accrued unlawful presence, and what waivers or exceptions might apply.

Source: Original Article

Read Original Article →