Texas Official Says New USCIS Rule Threatens More Than 1.5 Million Immigrant Workers

Key Takeaways

What officials say

It has been reported that a Texas official described a recently announced USCIS rule as threatening more than 1.5 million immigrant workers who rely on agency-issued work authorization. USCIS, the federal agency that processes immigration benefits including EADs (Employment Authorization Documents), has issued regulatory changes in the past that alter who qualifies for work authorization or the timing of when work permits are issued. The Texas statement frames the rule as a sweeping change that would shrink the pool of authorized workers and create immediate employment uncertainty for many households.

Who could be affected and why it matters

USCIS issues EADs to a range of groups: people adjusting status to lawful permanent residence, certain nonimmigrant dependents (for example, H‑4 or L‑2 spouses, where eligible), asylum applicants, DACA recipients and beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status (TPS). If the rule narrows eligibility, requires new documentation, or shortens automatic extensions and renewal grace periods, those groups could face gaps in employment authorization. For real people that means lost paychecks, difficulty keeping jobs, and stress for families and employers who rely on those workers; employers may face compliance questions about hiring and retaining affected employees.

USCIS has faced long processing backlogs and periodic fee and policy changes in recent years; adjustments to EAD rules have been litigated before. It has been reported that state officials in Texas may pursue legal remedies — injunctions or lawsuits — to block or slow implementation, a step the state has taken in previous immigration disputes. For individuals, the practical advice is straightforward: monitor USCIS notices, submit timely renewal applications when eligible, preserve proof of continuous employment authorization, and consult an immigration lawyer to evaluate options. The precise legal effect of the new rule and its timeline for implementation remain subject to official USCIS guidance and potential court rulings.

Source: Original Article

Read Original Article →