Over 6,200 minors reportedly held in ICE custody during the Trump administration

Key Takeaways

What the reporting says

It has been reported that internal government records and reporting from El País show ICE detained more than 6,200 minors at various points during the Trump administration. The children were allegedly held in ICE custody in connection with enforcement operations, including the 2018 "zero tolerance" family-separation policy and other arrests at or after entry. ICE is the agency responsible for immigration arrests and removals; HHS/ORR is the agency statutorily charged with the care of unaccompanied children and children separated from their parents.

The number — if borne out by official disclosures — is noteworthy because federal law and long-standing settlement agreements set standards for how children in immigration proceedings should be housed and treated. It has been reported that some of the detained children were transferred later to HHS custody, while others were identified as having been held by ICE for significant periods before transfer.

Flores v. Reno is the 1997 settlement that limits the detention of minors and requires certain standards of care, placement in the least restrictive setting, and timely release to relatives when appropriate. Child welfare advocates argue that prolonged ICE custody of minors — or placement in adult-detention settings — can violate Flores and other protections. The Trump administration argued it needed tools to enforce immigration laws and to process families and parents who had been criminally prosecuted, which sometimes led to complex custody situations.

For immigrants, lawyers, and family members, these revelations matter concretely: detained children face trauma and obstacles to legal representation, and poor record-keeping can complicate reunification efforts. If you or a client were separated from a child during this period, these reports underscore the importance of obtaining all available government records, seeking legal counsel experienced in family-reunification and immigration litigation, and monitoring ongoing investigations or settlement processes that might provide remedies.

Source: [Original Article](https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMizAFBVV95cUxNRTJSVng4RzE0Y1pIdGU0SGNwaHVWS3FlV0o5dTl0bWpQdkdaa21rYk5leVFiaElJcm5qSWxfZ1FQdS1UbXl1em1YcU03N0cyX0lXc181TTFFM0N2V0p0U3AxcUZXamp4X09YSjBiZmo4VVRZZGNneGhPbEs0SXllRG53QUtydVhIR2g1bHVjODFLT3JoNHhyX25EbWZpRGp1c3lweFRIS3VHOV9hV1ZzWUNEZjM1UGxuRTV6am5md2p3T210Q0JVNko1U3DSAeABQVVfeXFMTUp6TjZDanRjdEJLZHpEYTdHMjlpWmhxTnR5cy1wUGJzRTNWY0k0aGVFc2VGY2d5Q21PYkVrMXpWbVRtNEpyY0htdmRLUW9sZmtoM1MydVRSU0hudndqWjhCMGZuOVRzdDk4dVZGN1dleUkwWkQxbHNFUmtQbWt3Yn

Read Original Article →