Half of Americans back abolishing ICE amid Trump crackdown, poll finds
Key Takeaways
- A new Economist/YouGov poll finds 50% of Americans support abolishing ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement).
- The finding comes amid an intensified enforcement push by the Trump administration and an ongoing federal government shutdown.
- It has been reported that South Dakota governor Kristi Noem defended describing some migrants as “terrorists,” fueling rhetoric around enforcement.
- Abolishing ICE would require congressional action to restructure the Department of Homeland Security and reassign ICE’s functions.
- For immigrants and applicants: interior enforcement continues; USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) is typically fee-funded and operates during shutdowns, but court schedules and ICE check-ins may face disruptions.
Poll snapshot and political climate
Half of Americans now back abolishing ICE, according to a new Economist/YouGov poll, a striking marker of how polarized immigration enforcement has become amid the Trump administration’s renewed crackdown. It has been reported that South Dakota governor Kristi Noem defended calling some migrants “terrorists,” underscoring sharper rhetoric as the federal government shutdown drags on. The confluence of polling, politics, and policy stasis is shaping the immigration landscape for both enforcement targets and lawful applicants.
What ICE is — and what “abolish ICE” would entail
ICE, a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agency created in 2003, conducts interior immigration enforcement through Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) and handles a wide range of criminal investigations via Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), including smuggling, trafficking, and export controls. Calls to “abolish ICE” are political demands, not legal changes; dismantling the agency would require Congress to amend the Homeland Security Act and determine where to move or how to limit ERO and HSI authorities. Even if ICE were disbanded, immigration enforcement responsibilities could be reassigned within DHS or to other agencies, meaning the effect on arrests, detentions, and removals would hinge on how authorities are redistributed and constrained.
What this means if you’re navigating the system now
For people inside the U.S. without lawful status, interior enforcement remains active; check-ins with ICE, workplace operations, and at-large arrests can continue regardless of the shutdown. For applicants and petitioners, USCIS — which processes benefits such as green cards, work permits, and naturalization — is primarily fee-funded and generally keeps operating during shutdowns, though some programs that rely on appropriated funds can slow. Immigration courts (EOIR, under the Department of Justice) often prioritize detained dockets during funding lapses, while non-detained hearings may be delayed; individuals should monitor their case status closely, keep addresses current, and consult counsel before travel or rescheduling. The headline polling figure signals rising political pressure on Congress to define the future of enforcement — but for now, day-to-day rules and risks remain in place.
Source: Original Article