France urges DHS to free 86-year-old widow held by ICE after 90‑day visa overstay
Key Takeaways
- Marie‑Therese Ross, an 86‑year‑old French national, was detained by ICE on 1 April in Alabama after allegedly overstaying a 90‑day visa, and is held at a Louisiana immigration facility.
- The French government and its consul in New Orleans have “fully mobilized,” visiting Ross and urging the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to secure her release.
- It has been reported that Ross married a US veteran last year and that her detention is part of a broader enforcement push that has affected spouses of service members.
- Overstaying a Visa Waiver/ESTA visit can lead to removal proceedings; consular advocacy can secure visits and raise humanitarian concerns but cannot unilaterally stop detention.
- For detainees and families, immediate steps are to contact an immigration lawyer and the detainee’s consulate — possible avenues include requests for release on humanitarian grounds or parole.
Detention and diplomatic pressure
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), detained Marie‑Therese Ross on 1 April in Alabama after she allegedly overstayed a 90‑day visit, DHS officials have said. Ross, 86, is reportedly being held in a federal immigration detention center in Louisiana. The French consul general in New Orleans, Rodolphe Sambou, has visited her twice and told reporters France has “fully mobilized” in efforts to secure her release and ensure she has adequate food and medical care.
Legal and policy context
A 90‑day stay typically refers to travel under the Visa Waiver Program using an ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), which allows short visits without a visa; overstaying any authorized period can trigger removal (deportation) proceedings and complicate future travel to the US. It has been reported that Ross is one of several spouses of US service members and veterans who have faced increased enforcement under recent administration priorities — a shift from earlier discretionary leniency that, according to reports, was curtailed during the Trump administration’s expanded removals policy. DHS and ICE have broad discretion in detention and parole decisions; consular advocacy can influence humanitarian outcomes but does not replace legal relief.
Human impact and immediate implications
This case highlights the human consequences when enforcement intersects with age, bereavement and cross‑border family ties. For the detainee and her family, detention means separation from community and potential medical risk at an advanced age. For other immigrants, the practical lesson is to seek legal counsel early: a lawyer can explore release on humanitarian parole, requests for deferred action, or litigation, while the detainee’s consulate can provide visits, monitor welfare and press DHS for case review. Ultimately, outcomes depend on individual legal status, medical factors, and DHS/ICE discretion — but diplomatic attention can accelerate review in high‑profile humanitarian cases.
Source: Original Article