Old Dominion University shooter identified as previously convicted ISIS supporter; attack probed as terrorism
Key Takeaways
- FBI identified the gunman as Mohammed Bailor Jalloh, 36, previously convicted of attempting to provide material support to ISIS.
- One person, Army Lt. Col. Brandon A. Shah, was killed; two other Army personnel were injured. The suspect also died at the scene.
- The attack in Norfolk, Virginia, is being investigated as terrorism, officials said; Jalloh was reportedly on federal probation at the time.
- Jalloh served in the Virginia National Guard (2009–2015) and was honorably discharged with no deployments, officials said.
- For noncitizens, terrorism-related convictions can trigger removal and bar immigration benefits; the suspect’s immigration status was not disclosed.
What happened
The gunman who opened fire in an Old Dominion University classroom on Thursday has been identified by the FBI as Mohammed Bailor Jalloh, 36, a man previously convicted in federal court of supporting ISIS, the Islamic State group. One person was killed and two were injured in the attack; all three were U.S. Army personnel, according to Army officials. The fatality was identified as Lt. Col. Brandon A. Shah. FBI officials said they are investigating the shooting as an act of terrorism. Authorities said Jalloh shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the attack before students subdued him; he died at the scene.
Prior terrorism conviction and supervision
Court records show Jalloh pleaded guilty in 2016 to attempting to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization, a federal offense under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B. Prosecutors said he sent gift card codes to an undercover FBI employee he believed was an ISIS member and sought to obtain an assault rifle as part of what they described as a plan to target U.S. military personnel. He received an 11-year prison sentence followed by five years of probation and was released in 2024. It has been reported that he was on federal supervision when Thursday’s shooting occurred; the probation office overseeing his case did not immediately comment.
Legal and immigration context
A federal conviction for providing material support to a terrorist group carries up to 20 years in prison and has sweeping consequences for noncitizens. Under U.S. immigration law, terrorism-related activity can render a person inadmissible (INA § 212(a)(3)(B)) and deportable (INA § 237(a)(4)(B)), and it generally bars immigration benefits adjudicated by USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services), including visas, green cards, and many forms of relief. Such grounds, known as TRIG (terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds), are broad and can apply regardless of whether the person was convicted. The suspect’s citizenship or immigration status has not been disclosed, and no immigration action specific to him has been announced.
What this means now
For campuses and communities, the case raises fresh questions about post-release supervision in terrorism cases and coordination between federal probation, campus security, and federal law enforcement. For immigrants and visa applicants, it underscores how any terrorism-related conduct—proven or even alleged—can derail applications, trigger extensive vetting, or lead to removal proceedings. Attorneys advising noncitizen clients with any past security-related issues should anticipate heightened screening, possible delays, and the need for detailed evidence to overcome TRIG-related concerns. As the investigation continues, officials have not signaled any immediate policy shifts, but terrorism probes often prompt reviews of supervision protocols and information-sharing.
Source: Original Article