IRS-ICE data sharing drives tax-filing fears; Yale warns up to $479 billion revenue loss

Key Takeaways

What happened

It has been reported that the IRS began sharing personal tax information with ICE in a move that broke with longstanding expectations of return confidentiality. Generally, tax returns are protected under federal law (IRC Section 6103), but the recent policy change — including reports that about 47,000 addresses of people facing deportation were shared — has amplified fear in immigrant communities. In the Washington–Baltimore region, tax preparers say hundreds of clients have stopped coming in, a pattern they trace to both the data-sharing action and stepped-up immigration enforcement.

Why it matters

Experts warn the consequences go beyond community fear. Yale’s Budgeting for Federal Policy Lab projects that if undocumented immigrants and other affected filers withdraw from formal payroll systems and move into informal work, federal receipts could fall by roughly $147 billion to $479 billion over 10 years. That estimate reflects lower wage withholding and reduced participation in taxable employment; payroll withholding funds Social Security and Medicare, and state and local revenues also depend on formal economic activity. It has been reported that new rules requiring SSNs to claim certain tax credits — for example, portions of the child tax credit — have further reduced the refund incentive for ITIN-based filers.

What this means for people navigating immigration and taxes now

For immigrants, the calculus has become harder. A clean tax record can be evidence of good moral character or continuous presence in some immigration processes, but many now weigh that against real fear of detection and deportation. Tax preparers and immigrant advocates urge people to consult qualified tax professionals and immigration attorneys about filing options, confidentiality limits, and potential protections. Policymakers and service providers will be watching whether the reported drop in filings reverses if rules or enforcement priorities change — but experts say rebuilding trust will take time, and lost revenue and reduced access to formal employment could have long-term effects on families and public programs.

Source: Original Article

Read Original Article →